Fully balanced amplification system?

We all start somewhere
Post Reply
gdog
User
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:32 pm

#1 Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by gdog »

Is it possible to implement a fully balanced amplification system -where the cartridge output is split in half with a potential divider and all subsequent stages are singled ended only meeting as push-pull in the final output transformer? Is this a bad idea? If so why?
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15708
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#2 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by Nick »

Its possible, a cartridge is inherently balanced anyway if both outputs are floating. It would be normal though to let each stage retain the balance by seeing the other half as a long tailed pair.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
gdog
User
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:32 pm

#3 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by gdog »

Interesting, reading this forum I see that transformers are a little out of vogue :D , but do you think its possible that such a topology could have the strengths of a SET but with the power and range of a good PP? Better for example than a parallel SE output stage?
gdog
User
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:32 pm

#4 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by gdog »

I suppose really the LTP is a phase inverter so in essence which every way you cut it this is a PP design
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15708
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#5 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by Nick »

Well, a LTP can be used as a phase splitter, but if fed with a balanced signal, its just a balanced amplifier.
but do you think its possible that such a topology could have the strengths of a SET but with the power and range of a good PP? Better for example than a parallel SE output stage?
Maybe, but without being awkward, you may have to say what you view strengths and weaknesses of single ended and push pull, as I find its never as clear as once I would have thought.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
User avatar
izzy wizzy
Old Hand
Posts: 1496
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Auckland NZ
Contact:

#6 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by izzy wizzy »

Nick wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:50 pm Maybe, but without being awkward, you may have to say what you view strengths and weaknesses of single ended and push pull, as I find its never as clear as once I would have thought.
For sure. So much material and detail to be mined from such a simple statement.

Cheers,
Stephen
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#7 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by IslandPink »

Best PP amp I ever heard was Gary Pimm's Tabor amp with the 1624 valves. That was IDHP > DHP push-pull with direct coupling & stacked power supplies. Stunning speed, transparency and great tonal colour.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
gdog
User
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 12:32 pm

#8 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by gdog »

I have a rather limited experience of different amplifiers. I am not a constant tweaker, rather I am seeking an end-state system, which is good enough for me to forget about.

Currently I have a WD phono and KT88 amplifier sitting between my newly acquired 401 and my Tannoy Kensingtons. The speakers and the turntable are done, they are simply everything I will ever want. My digital is also done.

I do think that the amplifier could eventually be replaced however, I’m just not sure with what I can either build or acquire. I am musing over the various topologies; I had a SET in my system once and like all the expectations it had a wonderful detail mid-range with instruments and voices floating in the air but didn’t really have low end control. I listen to a wide variety of music including big orchestras which means that bottom end detail and drive are essential characteristics for any candidate amplifier.
steve s
Shed dweller
Posts: 2829
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 6:19 pm
Location: east yorks

#9 Re: Fully balanced amplification system?

Post by steve s »

gdog wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:54 pm I had a SET in my system once and like all the expectations it had a wonderful detail mid-range with instruments and voices floating in the air but didn’t really have low end control. I listen to a wide variety of music including big orchestras which means that bottom end detail and drive are essential characteristics for any candidate amplifier.
You had the wrong single ended amp .

In the nineties a local hifi shop let me take home 3 or 4 single ended amps
Most where rejected on account of the bass performance. I eventually bought a 'simply 845' amp. But that lasted only a few months in my system due to the heat/ 1000volts/ poor sound
I think my system plays everything now... 5 watts se and 100+db speakers.
The tube manual is quite like a telephone book. The number of it perfect. It is useful to make it possible to speak with a girl. But we can't see her beautiful face from the telephone number
Post Reply