WAV vs FLAC

I think we all know by now what this section is for.
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20684
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex

#1 WAV vs FLAC

Post by pre65 »

There is a chap on HFS who has been converting his CDs to FLAC files , but out of interest he converted one to WAV as well, and thinks the WAV is a noticable improvement.

Has any "digitifile" here tried the same test and come to a similar conclusion ?

As data storage is so (relatively) cheap these days is FLAC still necessary ?

https://hifisubjectivist.org/viewtopic. ... 63#p161163
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 14950
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#2 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by Nick »

A more interesting test would be to convert the flack back to wav and see if he can tell a difference. While he was doing that, he could run a check sum on the direct wav and the via flac wav and see if there was a difference.

If he can still tell a difference, I would say the problem is in the server or renderer converting in real time.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20684
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex

#3 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by pre65 »

If I was an HFS member I would put that question to the man concerned.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9791
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#4 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by IslandPink »

I haven't tried 'serving' WAV yet. I have found that a CD played direct to the Longdog DAC has more tone and spatial depth in the upper mids and treble than a FLAC of the same disc ( EAC>LMS>WiFi>Pi ) played via the server. In the bass end, or on 'PRAT' it's neck & neck or poss the server slightly ahead.
If I can get EAC to rip a couple of WAV files from the CD and play in the same way, I could try it some time soon.
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5275
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#5 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by ed »

As Nick has said..

the codec and the equipment(h/w) used to do the rendering could have an effect.

I have years of playing the two formats here on various equipment and have never noticed any difference. The checksum test would be a good illuminator, but never tried it.

Be interested to know what the reproduction chain is that this chap is using.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5275
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#6 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by ed »

having given this a bit(v. small) more thought any codec would have to either have an error or deviate from spec in order to generate different results whilst transcoding......

either is a possibility although the latter is less likely.

having said that, it does suggest that hardware differences would be the most likely if any differences were detected.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 14950
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#7 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by Nick »

If I can get EAC to rip a couple of WAV files from the CD and play in the same way, I could try it some time soon.
Just select the uncompressed extract and save to a different location (maybe add "- wav" ) after the CD name then its easy to do the comparison.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
User avatar
The Stratmangler
Shed dweller
Posts: 2765
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: Rossendale, Lancashire

#8 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by The Stratmangler »

IslandPink wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:07 am I haven't tried 'serving' WAV yet. I have found that a CD played direct to the Longdog DAC has more tone and spatial depth in the upper mids and treble than a FLAC of the same disc ( EAC>LMS>WiFi>Pi ) played via the server. In the bass end, or on 'PRAT' it's neck & neck or poss the server slightly ahead.
If I can get EAC to rip a couple of WAV files from the CD and play in the same way, I could try it some time soon.
Was the RasPi also connected to Nick's DAC?
Chris :happy3:
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5275
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#9 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by ed »

I had some time on my hands and a curiousity came over me. I'm pretty sure I satisfied myself about this a long time ago...but....

I mixed and mastered 3 tracks down to FLAC and the same tracks down to WAV...(Sonar X2 64bit)

playing them till bored I couldn't tell the difference.

I ran the WAV files through Easycd (EZ CD) and converted to flac(ratio 5)

played them against the WAV versions and couldn't tell the difference.

doesn't prove anything cos it was all about my ears but if the original poster can hear a difference I strongly suspect his transcoding/hardware has an issue.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9791
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#10 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by IslandPink »

The Stratmangler wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:36 pm Was the RasPi also connected to Nick's DAC?
Yes, should have added that !
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9791
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#11 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by IslandPink »

Nick wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:37 pm Just select the uncompressed extract and save to a different location (maybe add "- wav" ) after the CD name then its easy to do the comparison.
D'Oh ! Now I'll have to decide which album to use :roll:
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 14950
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#12 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by Nick »

IslandPink wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:01 pm
The Stratmangler wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:36 pm Was the RasPi also connected to Nick's DAC?
Yes, should have added that !
Even so, you still have loads of differences. The Pi is going via USB to the USB input board in the dac, is powered by the pi supply, and is talking to the dac chip via some isolating buffers. The DC is going via sp/diff via input transformer, into receiver chip with its own voltage regulators, via isolating buffer to dac chip.
Little known fact, coherent thought can destructively interfere with itself leaving no thought at all, that’s why I prefer incoherent thought.
User avatar
The Stratmangler
Shed dweller
Posts: 2765
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: Rossendale, Lancashire

#13 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by The Stratmangler »

IslandPink wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:01 pm
The Stratmangler wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:36 pm Was the RasPi also connected to Nick's DAC?
Yes, should have added that !
How is it connected?
USB or SPDIF?

Diet - Nick got in there just before me. The bit about the isolating transformers on the SPDIF is interesting.
Chris :happy3:
User avatar
IslandPink
Loony Bin!
Posts: 9791
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#14 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by IslandPink »

Looks like Nick answered that one.
D'Oh now you edited and my comment looks superfluous !
"Forever fair ... and I'm touching your hair. I wish we could be dreaming .... in this dream" ( Morrison )
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5275
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#15 Re: WAV vs FLAC

Post by ed »

any chance of going back to the original post/question...this thread is becoming a runaway train....

Flac has now been with us in the mainstream for 15 years......if the WAV is better than FLAC argument had any mileage don't you think we'd have heard about it by now?

maybe we have and I've just missed it....doh!
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
Post Reply